Gas Centre United Nations Logo Unece Logo

 

Report on Security of Natural Gas Supply in the European Part of the Unece Area

IV. POLICY FRAMEWORK

1. Regulatory framework

Changes in the European gas market, mainly triggered by the liberalization process, will lead to new structures and a redistribution of responsibilities. As transmission and distribution activities have to be legally separated from other activities in the gas chain, responsibility for security of supply will be a shared responsibility of all market players. At the same time take-overs and mergers are taking place.

All relevant market players should be involved in deciding on the required levels of security of supply and how those levels should be implemented. The end-consumers have their demands and they pay for it. The gas industry is responsible for supplying what is contracted. It will be a challenge for the total gas industry to maintain the efficiency and reliability which the end-consumers are used to.

Current and planned regulations for the gas market have an impact on all parts of the gas supply chain, including conditions and tariffs for infrastructure access and internal company structures. Since the implementation of the European Gas Directive in the national legislation of the EU member countries and the accession countries, access to infrastructure has to be given on the basis of negotiated or regulated third party access (TPA). According to the second EU Gas Directive that has been set into force in August 2003, access to transmission and distribution networks will be based in the EU member states on regulated TPA, in whatever form. The member states have to transform the Directive into national law by mid 2004.

Most countries in Europe already have a regulatory authority in place. Regulation should support market development including the required investments in infrastructure. For that reason it should be restricted to providing and enabling a framework and a level playing field for all market participants. Unnecessary regulation would only add to overheads and lead to distortion in the market.

With respect to security of supply we see the main responsibility with the market participants, especially when it comes to the application of specific measures, like the use of flexibility in the system or interruptible contracts. As legal unbundling will take place in the EU, in all EU countries the new entities will have to act according to their (new) responsibilities. However, such a full-scale unbundling may cause risks in synchronizing decision-making in production/supply and infrastructure, and could also increase administrative and technical expenses in the event of overregulation.

This may have a negative impact on the efficiency of the whole gas industry and consequently lead to unnecessary increase of tariffs and end consumer gas prices. The main problem would be the obvious discrepancy between decision-making on the infrastructure and decision-making on market developments/supply. Lower investments in the infrastructure and discrepancies between transportation/service contracts and supply/trade contracts could seriously affect the security of supply.

The main elements which should be reflected in any market structure are:

  • A stable and predictable regulatory and political framework;
  • Clear roles and responsibilities and a level playing field for all market participants;
  • A positive investment climate;
  • Contractual freedom.

In the event that the magnitude of a new infrastructure project (for instance a new transit pipeline system) and the risks involved are too large to be handled only by private investors, it could be considered whether governments or supranational bodies or institutions should or could facilitate such projects. However, such assistance/support should not jeopardise competition on the gas market.